Compare
Creytix vs Profound: Which Platform Actually Fixes Your AI Visibility?
Profound is the current leader of the AI-visibility (GEO) category — tracking how a brand shows up inside ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, and other AI answer engines, at a $1B valuation with Fortune-500 clients. It's a genuinely new category, and Profound got there first at the enterprise end.
What Profound does well
Profound deserves real credit for defining a category that barely existed a couple of years ago: measuring and reporting how AI engines represent a brand, at a rigor level that's earned Fortune-500 trust and a $1B valuation. GEO is, per this study, the fastest-growing wedge in marketing software right now, and Profound was early and credible enough to become the enterprise reference point for it.
Where it stops
Profound's own category verdict is stated directly in this study: it's a $1B company that reports. Enterprise clients get a rigorous picture of their AI-engine visibility, and then have to go fix whatever's wrong — a bad product description, missing structured data, thin content — somewhere else entirely, disconnected from the report itself.
What Creytix does differently
This is the study's headline wedge message, written specifically with a company like Profound in mind: "Profound is a $1B company that reports. We report and publish the fix." Creytix's multi-engine AI-visibility module is built into the same platform that built the site and runs the content pipeline — so when the GEO report flags a gap, the fix is a same-system action, not a handoff to a separate team or tool, and not a second project that has to be scheduled and budgeted separately from the report itself.
At Profound's $499+/mo entry price, it's also priced for enterprise budgets; Creytix's GEO execution is included inside the $199/mo Business OS tier, not a separate enterprise-only line item.
Where this fits in the bigger picture
Profound's $1B valuation is, in this study's own analysis, one of the clearest signals that the entire market is repricing around AI-visibility as a distinct, urgent need — alongside Adobe's $1.9B Semrush acquisition and Peec AI's rapid growth, it's part of the evidence that GEO is the fastest-growing wedge in marketing software today. Profound earned that valuation by being first and rigorous at the enterprise end. Creytix isn't trying to out-report Profound for Fortune-500 clients — it's targeting the much larger population of small businesses who need the same category of insight but can't justify a $499+/mo enterprise monitoring tool, and who need the fix published, not just flagged.
Pricing comparison
| Profound | Creytix | |
|---|---|---|
| Entry | $499+/mo | $0 — free tools + trial |
| Core tier | $499+/mo, enterprise-focused | $49/mo — Launch: site + hosting + basic SEO + content + email |
| Top tier | $1B valuation, Fortune-500 clients, report-only | $199/mo — Business OS: full SEO/GEO execution loop, content pipeline, CRM, books, agents |
| Pricing model | Enterprise subscription | Flat, generous allowances |
Who should choose which
If you're a large enterprise that needs the most rigorous, dedicated AI-visibility monitoring available, with the reporting depth that comes from serving Fortune-500 clients, Profound is the established, credible choice at the top of the category. If you're a small business or micro-SMB that needs the GEO report to actually translate into a published fix — without an enterprise budget or a separate execution team — that's the case for Creytix's closed-loop approach. Enterprises with dedicated engineering teams already capable of acting on Profound's reports quickly may find the reporting-only model perfectly workable.
Pricing
Free for personal use. Join the beta.
25 free credits at signup — commercial checkout opens at general availability, beta members go first.
Join the betaSee it end to end
Walk through the platform on a real workspace
Request a demo and we will route it around whichever lane you are replacing first — build tooling, design system, QA, automation, or AI visibility.
